These limits matter because the safest answer is sometimes “we need the governing document,” not a guess. They also show where tenants, organizers, agencies and researchers can add better information.
01The current public address search is LIHTC/NHPD-scoped, not a universal residential-building search.A missing address means the current LIHTC search layer did not return a match. It does not mean the building does not exist or lacks rent regulation, affordability restrictions, tax benefits, regulatory agreements or other protections. Broader NYC residential-building coverage is under development.
02Most building-level governing expiration dates still require document review.A database can identify an important year to investigate, but the controlling agreement may contain a different or longer affordability term.
03No single federal dataset captures every New York affordability protection.HPD/HDC/HCR restrictions, 421-a/Affordable New York, J-51/J-51R, 485-x, Article XI, rent stabilization and other layers can overlap and must be checked separately.
04Owner type is unknown for 43.9% of the current NYC research layer.Unknown does not mean problematic. It means the controlling or registered ownership entity still needs to be identified and verified.
05Total property units are not the same as currently regulated affordable units.District and organizer tools label this field as total units in LIHTC properties rather than assuming every apartment remains income-restricted.
06A missing protection in our data is not proof that no protection exists.Public datasets can be incomplete. A building may have a local regulatory agreement, rent-regulated apartments, a tax-benefit restriction or another protection that is not yet visible in the combined record.
07Time-sensitive political information can change faster than property data.Bill status, sponsor lists and officeholders are dated and refreshed separately so a housing record does not silently carry stale advocacy information.