District preservation dashboard
See where the preservation pressure deserves attention.
Compare districts using the same property, ownership, credit-type and screening signals that power the Organizer Hub and legislative briefs. The dashboard is designed to help advocates decide where to ask harder questions first.
District comparison
Preservation intelligence by legislative district
The default ranks districts by total units in LIHTC properties with an early-warning year within five years. You can also surface districts where a warning year has already arrived or passed — an especially important signal for immediate document review and tenant outreach.
Loading district geometry and preservation data…
—districts in this chamber
—total units in represented LIHTC properties
—units where warning year arrived / passed
—units within 5-year screening window
—for-profit-signal units within 5 years
—owner-unknown properties within 5 years
“Arrived / passed” means the dataset screening year is the current year or earlier — not that legal affordability necessarily ended.Owner / credit fields are research signals from the NYC enrichment where available.Outside NYC, these fields may remain unknown until additional state/national enrichment is built.
| # | District | Properties | Total units | Arrived/passed units | 0–2 yr units | ≤5 yr units | For-profit ≤5 yr units | Owner ? ≤5 yr props | 4% ≤5 yr units | Date ? props | Brief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||||||
Methodology safeguard: The early-warning year is a preservation-screening signal, not automatically a controlling legal expiration. A warning year that has arrived or passed means the property should be prioritized for verification — not that affordability definitely ended. Ownership and credit type are administrative-data enrichment fields and can be incomplete. “No other federal subsidy identified” would not mean no other protection exists; local/state agreements and rent regulation require separate research.